Take TradeZella, if
- You need a phone and access from any device
- Your broker is missing from our 29 and present in theirs
- Community and education inside the product matter to you
AQREVI vs TradeZella
The most frequent comparison: both cover the journal, the analytics and prop accounts. They diverge in one place, and it is not in the feature list.
checked · 2026-09-03What this product is
A mature cloud journal with a large audience, education inside the product and a team that adds brokers quickly.
Short version
Which to choose
Take AQREVI, if
- You want your own board, metrics from a phrase and AI claims checked against the data
- You need trailing drawdown computed before the firm decides
- A metric must open to its formula rather than be taken on faith
- You need a copier between your own accounts without a second subscription
Honestly
Where they are stronger
Broker coverage
Their integrations live on their side and get added faster than ours. We have 29 platforms; they have more. If yours is missing from ours, that settles it, and there is nothing to argue about.
Phone access
Their journal is easy to open from any device. Ours opens in a phone browser, but it's built for a large screen, and we have no separate app.
Education and community
They have education and a large community inside. We have a trader feed that shows only R by default, and no courses, nor any planned.
Row by row
The same rows, just the two of us
| What is compared | AQREVIA journal, prop tracker and copier in the browser | TradeZellaA cloud journaltheir site |
|---|---|---|
| Where your trades liveWho holds your history and how you take it with you. Ours: a separate database per account and a full export at any moment; a local version is on the roadmap. | On our server, a separate database per account | On their servers |
| Works with no internetThe independence test. Today we are a web service like everyone in this table; the local version is how we intend to pass it. | Not yet; a local version is planned | |
| Access from another deviceThe one thing people go to the cloud for on merit rather than habit. We are in the cloud now, so it works as it does everywhere else. | Any browser, after sign-in | |
| What happens if you stop payingThe most expensive row here, and usually absent from every such table. A journal is kept for years — the question is not the monthly price but how it ends. | Moves to Free; the journal and export stay | Export before it lapses |
| How many platforms connectWe lose this row, and it is the honest price of independence: a cloud service keeps integrations on its own side and grows them faster. | 29, six of them directly | More; exact count unverified |
| Prop firm rules in an engineNot "prop account support" but a trailing drawdown computed against your trades — the thing accounts are actually closed over. | 130+ programs, phases apart, checked weekly | There is a prop section; no rule catalogue seen |
| A copier between your own accountsA separate product everywhere else — and a separate subscription. Here it is part of the journal, not a second subscription. | As a map, simulation first, live on MT5 and TradeLocker | |
| A metric opens to its formulaThe only way to argue with a number without access to someone's code. Without it a metric is an opinion with a digit attached. | The formula and the trades under it | A number, not its derivation |
| The model computes no numbersNot "is there AI" but whether it can invent a figure. A confident sentence with a fabricated number is worse than no AI at all. | The engine computes, one model explains, a second checks | No such separation is claimed |
| Your own model or your own keyIf the model is not yours, your trades go wherever the vendor decided and cost whatever the vendor sets. | Your own Anthropic, OpenAI, Google or other key | |
| A phone appThere is no native app. The web version opens in a phone browser, but it is built for a large screen. | Phone browser, no app | |
| Starting price per monthPrices were checked on one day and they change. The date sits beside them for that reason: a comparison page outlives a price list. | Free $0, paid from 39 | $35 |
In substance
Where the architectures diverge, not the descriptions
Where the trades live — and why it is not about paranoia
At launch both they and we keep your history on a server, and we will not pretend otherwise. The difference is in the build: each of our accounts has its own database rather than rows in a shared table, and a full export is a button in the app. A file on your own disk that nobody can lock you out of comes with the local version.
A metric you can take apart
Their dashboard shows a number. Ours shows the number, the formula and the trades it was assembled from. The difference shows up on the day your figures disagree with the broker's: an argument with an opaque dashboard cannot be won, only abandoned.
Prop: a section versus a rule engine
Both have prop accounts. Ours is a catalogue of over 130 programs from some thirty firms, with challenge and funded rules side by side, a weekly check and a live guard that computes trailing drawdown against the open account. We found no dated rule catalogue on their side. If one has appeared, write to us and we'll fix the page.
A model that is not allowed to compute
Both have AI. Ours doesn't compute: an engine under tests produces the numbers, the review model explains them and the decision model checks every claim in a review against the data. They don't state such a split. That's the absence of a promise, not an accusation.
Questions
What people ask about this pair
Can I move my history from them to you?
Yes, by file: export your trades there and import them here. The column mapping is picked up automatically; anything that is not maps once by hand and behaves like a preset afterwards.
Are you cheaper?
We have Free forever: one account, the journal, analytics and prop guard. Our paid Core costs more than their entry plan as of the check date; both prices are in the table above.
What if you shut down?
The journal exports from the app at any time. Keep a recent export, and a shutdown won't take your history. A local version with the database on your side is planned.