Take TraderSync, if
- Your broker is missing here and present there
- You need phone access
- You run no prop challenges and need no firm rules
AQREVI vs TraderSync
One of the oldest journals in the category, with wide broker coverage. Compared on properties visible from their public pages.
checked · 2026-09-03What this product is
A long-running cloud journal with a large broker list and detailed trade analytics.
Short version
Which to choose
Take AQREVI, if
- The journal must stay available after you cancel
- You need prop rules in an engine, not in notes
- You need a copier between your own accounts
Honestly
Where they are stronger
More brokers
Their list is wider than ours. We did not verify the exact count and will not invent a plausible one — but that it exceeds 29 is visible on their own page.
The product's age
It has run longer than ours, and maturity has a value novelty cannot buy: rare import cases already solved that we have not met yet.
Row by row
The same rows, just the two of us
| What is compared | AQREVIA journal, prop tracker and copier in the browser | TraderSyncA cloud journaltheir site |
|---|---|---|
| Where your trades liveWho holds your history and how you take it with you. Ours: a separate database per account and a full export at any moment; a local version is on the roadmap. | On our server, a separate database per account | On their servers |
| Works with no internetThe independence test. Today we are a web service like everyone in this table; the local version is how we intend to pass it. | Not yet; a local version is planned | |
| Access from another deviceThe one thing people go to the cloud for on merit rather than habit. We are in the cloud now, so it works as it does everywhere else. | Any browser, after sign-in | |
| What happens if you stop payingThe most expensive row here, and usually absent from every such table. A journal is kept for years — the question is not the monthly price but how it ends. | Moves to Free; the journal and export stay | Export before it lapses |
| How many platforms connectWe lose this row, and it is the honest price of independence: a cloud service keeps integrations on its own side and grows them faster. | 29, six of them directly | More; exact count unverified |
| Prop firm rules in an engineNot "prop account support" but a trailing drawdown computed against your trades — the thing accounts are actually closed over. | 130+ programs, phases apart, checked weekly | Not verified |
| A copier between your own accountsA separate product everywhere else — and a separate subscription. Here it is part of the journal, not a second subscription. | As a map, simulation first, live on MT5 and TradeLocker | |
| A metric opens to its formulaThe only way to argue with a number without access to someone's code. Without it a metric is an opinion with a digit attached. | The formula and the trades under it | A number, not its derivation |
| The model computes no numbersNot "is there AI" but whether it can invent a figure. A confident sentence with a fabricated number is worse than no AI at all. | The engine computes, one model explains, a second checks | No such separation is claimed |
| Your own model or your own keyIf the model is not yours, your trades go wherever the vendor decided and cost whatever the vendor sets. | Your own Anthropic, OpenAI, Google or other key | |
| A phone appThere is no native app. The web version opens in a phone browser, but it is built for a large screen. | Phone browser, no app | |
| Starting price per monthPrices were checked on one day and they change. The date sits beside them for that reason: a comparison page outlives a price list. | Free $0, paid from 39 | Not verified: the page blocks robots |
In substance
Where the architectures diverge, not the descriptions
The subscription, and what comes after it
With many cloud journals the data lives inside the subscription: stop paying and you're left with whatever you exported in time. With us the account moves to Free and the journal stays readable and exportable.
Prop challenges
We hold the rules of over 130 programs and compute trailing drawdown from them against the open account. Whether they have a rule engine, we haven't checked, and the table says exactly that.
We could not read their price page
Their pricing page blocks automated requests. Its cell says "not verified": a plausible number instead would be a lie indistinguishable from the truth, and it would devalue every other row.
Questions
What people ask about this pair
Why do you say so little about them?
Because some of their pages block automated requests, and writing about someone else's product from memory is not allowed. An empty cell is more honest than one filled by guess.
Is moving the history possible?
Yes, through a file export and an import here. Neither side is obliged to make it easy, but the shape of a trade table is much the same everywhere.