Take Edgewonk, if
- You need wide automatic import: 200+ brokers against our 29
- Their method of reviewing mistakes matters to you
- You need access from a phone and tablet
AQREVI vs Edgewonk
A journal with a strong tilt toward psychology and mistake review. With 200+ brokers and automatic import — per their own site.
checked · 2026-09-03What this product is
A web application with automatic import from 200+ brokers and deep work on mistakes and habits.
Short version
Which to choose
Take AQREVI, if
- You want your own database per account and a one-click export
- You run prop challenges
- You need a copier and a model on your own key
Honestly
Where they are stronger
200+ brokers against 29
This is our biggest loss in the table, and a substantive one: they have automatic import from over two hundred brokers per their own page. Check your platform in our directory — it is open before payment, and if it is missing, the argument is settled.
Work on mistakes and habits
It's a strength they've built over years. We have the price of each state in R, a tilt meter and behaviour signals, but their mistake-review method has had longer to mature.
Row by row
The same rows, just the two of us
| What is compared | AQREVIA journal, prop tracker and copier in the browser | EdgewonkA cloud journaltheir site |
|---|---|---|
| Where your trades liveWho holds your history and how you take it with you. Ours: a separate database per account and a full export at any moment; a local version is on the roadmap. | On our server, a separate database per account | On their servers |
| Works with no internetThe independence test. Today we are a web service like everyone in this table; the local version is how we intend to pass it. | Not yet; a local version is planned | A web application |
| Access from another deviceThe one thing people go to the cloud for on merit rather than habit. We are in the cloud now, so it works as it does everywhere else. | Any browser, after sign-in | |
| What happens if you stop payingThe most expensive row here, and usually absent from every such table. A journal is kept for years — the question is not the monthly price but how it ends. | Moves to Free; the journal and export stay | Export before it lapses |
| How many platforms connectWe lose this row, and it is the honest price of independence: a cloud service keeps integrations on its own side and grows them faster. | 29, six of them directly | 200+ by their own site |
| Prop firm rules in an engineNot "prop account support" but a trailing drawdown computed against your trades — the thing accounts are actually closed over. | 130+ programs, phases apart, checked weekly | Not verified |
| A copier between your own accountsA separate product everywhere else — and a separate subscription. Here it is part of the journal, not a second subscription. | As a map, simulation first, live on MT5 and TradeLocker | |
| A metric opens to its formulaThe only way to argue with a number without access to someone's code. Without it a metric is an opinion with a digit attached. | The formula and the trades under it | A number, not its derivation |
| The model computes no numbersNot "is there AI" but whether it can invent a figure. A confident sentence with a fabricated number is worse than no AI at all. | The engine computes, one model explains, a second checks | No such separation is claimed |
| Your own model or your own keyIf the model is not yours, your trades go wherever the vendor decided and cost whatever the vendor sets. | Your own Anthropic, OpenAI, Google or other key | |
| A phone appThere is no native app. The web version opens in a phone browser, but it is built for a large screen. | Phone browser, no app | Phone access per their own site |
| Starting price per monthPrices were checked on one day and they change. The date sits beside them for that reason: a comparison page outlives a price list. | Free $0, paid from 39 | No price stated on the home page |
In substance
Where the architectures diverge, not the descriptions
Not every cloud is built the same
Edgewonk opens in a browser at their address and the data sits on their side; they say it is never sold or analysed. That is a promise, and probably an honest one. At launch we are in the cloud too, and we will not pretend otherwise. Our difference is in a build you can check: its own database per account and a full export from inside the app. "Cannot look" is something only the local version will be able to say, once it ships.
The prop module
We found no prop firm rules there — the table says "not verified". For us it is a separate module: a catalogue with check dates, a live guard, and a watch that rereads the rules pages weekly and shows discrepancies with quotes.
Both products want you journalling in a bad week
And both solve it the same way: automatic import. Here we do not pretend to have invented anything — we simply reach across 29 platforms what they reach across two hundred.
Questions
What people ask about this pair
They have 200 brokers, you have 29. Why do you exist?
If your broker is on their list and not ours, pick them; that's the first row of the table. We're useful if you run challenges, copy trades between accounts or want AI claims checked against the data.
Is their data safe?
We don't know and won't claim to. With us each account has its own database, connection keys are stored encrypted, and the platform model is forbidden from keeping your data.