A catalogue by phase
Over 130 programs from some thirty firms. Each program keeps challenge and funded rules apart: limits, drawdown type, target, minimum days, consistency rule.
The firm's dashboard reports a breach once the account is gone. Prop guard reads your program's rules against the open account and shows the room left while you're still trading.

Where the trades come from
By then there is nothing to argue with. A trader needs the answer earlier: how much can I lose right now and keep the account. The firm's dashboard doesn't answer it, and neither does a spreadsheet.
trailing drawdown isn't computed the way it looks
How it works here
Over 130 programs from some thirty firms. Each program keeps challenge and funded rules apart: limits, drawdown type, target, minimum days, consistency rule.
Intraday trailing follows the open high, end-of-day trailing moves only at the close, a static wall stays put. A session one account survives ends another, so the engine computes the three methods separately.
Clear, careful or stop. Next to it is the amount: how much you can lose today and how much in total.
The guard reads the open account and shows the room to the daily and overall limits. For rules measured in seconds, such as a minimum hold, it shows the seconds left before you may enter.

Rules often change once you pass: the daily limit tightens, a consistency rule appears, the target goes away. The comparison table sits on the firm page, the program card and the account, with the differences highlighted.

Once a week a robot reads the firms' pages and compares them with the catalogue. Each decision goes to the news feed: what was fixed, on which quote, and what was left alone and why.

The wall on the left, the target on the right, a dot for where you are. Five challenges of different sizes won't compare in your head; on one scale you see them at once.

Where it differs
One competitor had prop-firm sync and live monitoring first, and covers more platforms. We go deeper on the rules: phase, drawdown type and exceptions are recorded per program, not as one rule per firm. Money is counted separately: fees, resets and the firm's share of payouts.
Check it yourself
The demo on the home page runs the same code as real accounts: $10,000, a 5% trailing limit and a profitable session that still closes under the line.
The order
Filter by market, size, rules and country. The card shows how the rules fit your history.
The program links to a journal account. The guard reads its real trades, so it never disagrees with the journal.
Open the account before entry: today's room, total room and the verdict.
What it does not do
Questions
No. We read their public terms and record the check date. Places in the catalogue and its order aren't for sale.
The weekly check finds the difference and posts it to the news. A running challenge keeps the rules you bought it under, and the account shows a note that the catalogue was updated.
Usually it's intraday trailing: the firm moves the wall on open highs, while the journal holds closed trades. That case is marked approximate, because the room shown is overstated.
No. The firm may delete its dashboard, and your records stay in your account. Before that happens, the account page reminds you to pull anything that exists only at the firm.
No. Prop guard sends nothing to the broker. It reads the history and does the maths; you place the orders.
After it decides there's nothing left to count. Today's room is useful while the trade isn't open yet.